Archive Page 2

New book from SOG member: Continuity and change in public policy and management

SOG member Christopher Pollitt of the Public Management Institute at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven is co-author, with Geert Bouckaert, of a new book from Edward Elgar Press: Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management.  The book provides a long-term view of policy developments in major public services in England and Belgium over the last half-century.  John Halligan says that the book contains “a pioneering and profound analysis that few current books in public policy and management can equal.”  Download the flyer.

SOG is the Structure and Organization of Government Group of the International Political Science Association, which sponsors GovernanceLearn how to join SOG.  SOG members receive a subscription to the print version of Governance.  New subscribers in the month of January 2010 will receive a complementary copy of Paul Starr’s book Freedom’s Power: The True Force of Liberalism.

New book by SOG member: public management reform in Southern Europe

SOG member Edoardo Ongaro of Bocconi University and the SDA Bocconi School of Management is author of a new book from Edward Elgar Press:  Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Guy Peters calls it “a major contribution to understanding the political and administrative systems of Southern Europe . . . [and] an excellent example of comparative analysis in general.”

SOG is the Structure and Organization of Government Group of the International Political Science Association, which sponsors GovernanceLearn how to join SOG.  SOG members receive a subscription to the print version of Governance.  New subscribers in the month of January 2010 will receive a complementary copy of Paul Starr’s book Freedom’s Power: The True Force of Liberalism.

Governance: New year, new design, new commentary on e-governance

New Governance designHappy new year!  Governance begins 2010 with a new design.  This is the first redesign of the journal since its launch in 1988.  Celebrate the new year by enjoying free access to all content in the new issue, 23.1, throughout January.

The new design includes a new feature at the start of each issue: a short commentary by a leading scholar or policymaker on a critical question of governance.  The first commentary is by Paul Starr, Stuart Professor of Communications and Public Affairs at Princeton University.

“The fundamental problems of democracy are not susceptible to technological solutions,” says Starr. In the current environment, “it will be a struggle just to maintain some of the minimal conditions of political accountability that democracy requires.”  Download Professor Starr’s commentary, “The Liberal State in a Digital World,” for free.

New book by SOG members on reform in Asia-Pacific

Governance book review editor Clay Wescott and SOG member Bidhya Bowornwathana are co-editors, with L.R. Jones, of a new book from Emerald Books: The Many Faces of Public Management Reform in the Asia-Pacific Region.  The collection of essays examines three categories of reforms within Asian public sectors: corruption and anti-corruption initiatives, public financial management reforms, and public management reforms within an emphasis on performance and results.

SOG is the Structure and Organization of Government Group of the International Political Science Association, which sponsors GovernanceLearn how to join SOG.  SOG members receive a subscription to the print version of Governance.

Reducing political control over administration: Agencification works

Advocates of agencification — the practice of “hiving off” functions into formally separated organizations — claim that it is an effective way of reducing political interference in operational matters.  Some have doubted the claim.  In the current issue of Governance (22.4), Morten Egeberg and Jarle Trondal use data from two decades of surveys of Norwegian civil servants to show that the argument has merit.  Organizational setting “makes a clear difference,” they conclude.  “Officials within ministerial departments are significantly more sensitive to signals from executive politicians than their counterparts within national agencies.”  Read the article: Political leadership and bureaucratic autonomy: Effects of agencification.

Civil service reform in Kazakhstan: The front-runner stumbles

Kazakhstan is hailed as a “front-runner in civil service reforms” in Central Asia, Saule Emrich-Bakenova says in the current issue of Governance (22.4).  Some call it a model for the developing world.  But Emrich-Bakenova argues that the main objective of new legislation — reducing political influence over the hiring and promotion of civil servants — has not really been achieved.   Although the Civil Service Law of 1999 was intended to create a depoliticized civil service, “the measures undertaken in fact established and formalized a broad range of discretionary opportunities for political influence.”  Emrich-Bakenova suggests that reformers should adjust their expectations about outcomes of reform in hostile political conditions. Read the article: Trajectory of civil service development in Kazakhstan: Nexus of politics and administration.

What happens to democratic representation in the era of “network governance”?

Carolyn HendriksWhat happens to conventional understandings about democratic representation when responsibility for policy formulation moves to new “governance networks”? Carolyn Hendriks explores this question in the current issue of Governance (22.4).  Examining participants in networks engaged in Dutch energy reform, Hendriks finds a “complex mix” of understandings about roles, which often “have little to do with conventional democratic understandings.”  Network participants, she says, “were mostly autonomous elites whose ‘democratic work’ is reduced to promoting symbolic messages when politically necessary.”  Read the article: The democratic soup: Mixed meanings of political representation in governance networks.

Governance book reviews: “an extraordinary book” on NIMBY fights in Japan, and more

Aldrich, Site FightsIn the current issue of Governance (22.4), Mary Alice Haddad says that Daniel Aldrichhas written an extraordinary book” about political struggles over the location of unpopular facilities in Japan.  Site Fights is a “methodologically sophisticated book” that describes the tactics used by communities and government agencies in the struggle over facility placement.

Also reviewed in the current issue: Michael Martinez, William Richardson and Camilla Stivers on administrative ethics; William Genieys and Marc Smyrl on policy elites; Lesley McAllister on environmental protection in Brazil; Cornelia Woll on the ways in which governments shape business attitudes about global trade liberalization; and Herbert Gottweis and Alan Petersen on the governance of “human biobanks.”  Read the reviews here.

Governance roundtable on crisis held in Boston

Jon Blondal, Deputy Head of Budgeting and Public Expenditures Division, OECD

Academics from fourteen universities participated in Governance’s roundtable on the impact of the financial crisis, held at Suffolk University Law School in Boston on November 13.  Current and former representatives of the Federal Reserve, Bank of England and OECD also joined the discussion, aimed at considering how the crisis was likely to change views about the role of government.  See more photos on Flickr.  A follow-on roundtable will be held in London in May 2010.

Policy on global warming: In Europe, the challenge is getting the car started

In the current issue of Governance, Christoffer Green-Pedersen and Michelle Wolfe contrast American and European approaches to the regulation of CO2 emissions, which contribute to global warming.  Popular explanations of the differing American and European approaches to environmental regulation often cite cultural differences, such as the US’ preference for market-based solutions.  But Green-Pedersen and Wolfe say more attention should be paid to structural differences in political systems that determine how policy agendas are established.  In the US, a more open system results in quicker attention to new issues, but a lower probability that this attention will be institutionalized.  In Denmark, by contrast, environmental policy making can be described as “a car that is difficult to start, but once started runs at a high and constant pace.”  Read more: The Institutionalization of Environmental Attention in the United States and Denmark: Multiple- Versus Single-Venue Systems.

« Previous PageNext Page »